ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2025
The case for targeting latent and lytic Epstein-Barr virus infection in multiple sclerosis.
Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting progressive multiple sclerosis: Toward mechanism-informed precision medicine.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
- Experimental Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Epstein-Barr Virus and Potential EBV-Related Therapeutic Strategies-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Viral associations in multiple sclerosis: pathogenetic mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Virology journal · 2026Review
- Recent advances in Epstein-Barr virus vaccines development from mechanistic exploration to clinical translation.NPJ vaccines · 2026Review
- Epstein-Barr Virus and Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review on Prevention and the Concept of an Infection-Driven Disease.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Targeting Epstein-Barr virus is a viable therapeutic strategy in multiple sclerosis: Commentary.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026Article
- Toward a global research agenda for preventing multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is strongly associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). It is likely to play a causal role in the pathogenesis of MS, possibly via triggering autoimmunity through molecular mimicry, autoantigenic presentation or immune dysregulation. Alternatively, evidence supports a direct role for EBV in driving MS disease activity via latent-lytic infection cycling either within the CNS or the periphery. We highlight the recent immunological and virological findings supporting the role of active EBV infection in MS, supporting an evaluation of anti-EBV strategies as potential treatments for MS. Anti-EBV strategies include CNS penetrant small molecule anti-viral agents targeting latent and lytic infection, and immunotherapies. Immunotherapies include EBV-specific autologous or allogeneic cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) and therapeutic EBV vaccines and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors to rejuvenate and boost endogenous EBV-targeted CTL responses. In parallel, several licensed MS disease-modifying therapies may work via mechanisms targeting EBV directly or indirectly. B-cell depleting therapies have been shown to have anti-EBV activity; additionally, new strategies to target intrathecal B cells, plasmablasts and plasma cells are being explored, including high-dose anti-CD20 therapy, cladribine, proteasome inhibitors, BTK inhibitors, CNS-penetrant anti-CD20/CD19 monoclonal antibodies and CD19-targeted CAR T cells. Innovative trial designs for proof-of-concept studies to test EBV antivirals and immunotherapies in MS are needed to catalyse a wave of drug development targeting EBV as a therapeutic strategy to prevent or treat MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.