ArticlePloS one2025
Burden and predictors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease occurrence and severity among an occupational cohort of United States Department of Energy former workers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that reduces lung function and primarily affects older adults. Evidence suggests that occupational exposures like diesel exhaust, cadmium, welding fumes, and silica increase the risk of COPD. Some United States Department of Energy (DOE) workers may be exposed to these noxious substances as they execute their job responsibilities. Assessment of the burden of COPD among these workers and identification of the potential associations between the condition and the above occupational exposures is important for guiding screening, prevention, and control programs. Therefore, the objectives of this study are to: (a) estimate the burden of COPD among former workers of the DOE in the United States and (b) investigate the association between occupational exposures and COPD occurrence and severity among these workers while controlling for environmental, behavioral, and socio-demographic factors.
methodsRetrospective data containing health screening records of former DOE workers, covering the time period 2006-2019, were obtained from the National Supplemental Screening Program. Multivariate imputation by chained equation was used to impute missing values. Binary and multinomial logistic regression models were used to investigate predictors of COPD occurrence and severity, respectively.
resultsOf the 17,376 participants included in the study, 20.8% had COPD. History of asthma, age at exam, body mass index, and smoking were significant predictors of both COPD occurrence and severity. Individuals exposed to silica had higher odds of COPD compared to those that were not exposed to silica. Similarly, diesel exhaust exposure was significantly associated with risk of more severe COPD.
conclusionsThe findings of this study demonstrate the importance of considering occupational experience in the assessment of both COPD occurrence and severity. This information may be important for occupational screening programs as well as aiding in identifying modifiable risk factors to guide prevention and control efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.