ArticleScientific reports2025
A performance evaluation of silver nanorods PDMS flexible dry electrodes for electrocardiogram monitoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extensive research is being conducted in fabricating flexible dry electrodes for electrocardiogram monitoring, but the electrodes' efficacy in clinical settings remains underexplored. In transition from research to commercial settings, investigating the electrode's performance in real-time monitoring and patient's comfort is very crucial. This study compares the ECG signal quality between flexible silver nanorods embedded in polydimethylsiloxane (AgNRs-PDMS) dry electrodes and commercially available metal electrodes. This study, conducted in a hospital, involves 50 subjects (40 males, 10 females; age range: 20-74) among which 41 were with cardiovascular disease and 9 normal subjects. The fabricated dry electrodes are biocompatible and have a lower skin-to-electrode impedance than the commercial electrodes, resulting in high-fidelity ECG signals. Signal quality was assessed based on parameters such as signal-to-noise ratio, mean amplitude, maximum amplitude, power spectral density, and heart rate comparison. The AgNRs-PDMS electrodes demonstrated superior SNR, confirmed using a paired t-test, with a p-value close to 0, indicating a significant difference in comparison with commercial electrodes. The amplitude of ECG signals captured by AgNRs-PDMS electrodes and the heart rate were observed to be comparable to metal electrodes. For automated arrhythmia classification of the ECG signals, two models were implemented. The first model utilized R-R interval for arrhythmic rhythm classification, while the second model used principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction followed by support vector machine (SVM) to classify arrhythmic beats. Large arrhythmia data sets like the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database were used for training and validating the above models. Accuracy results from the MIT-BIH test data set were 97% for the R-R interval method and 93% for the SVM method. The heart beats obtained from an arrhythmic patient using commercial metal electrodes and AgNRs-PDMS electrodes were classified using the classifiers. The AgNRs-PDMS dry electrodes offer superior signal quality, ease of use due to gel-free nature, and reusability, making them a promising alternative to commercial electrodes for clinical ECG monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.