ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025
ELISPOT as a predictor of clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection after hematopoietic cell transplantation in letermovir recipients.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative performance evaluation of the VIDAS cytomegalovirus (CMV) interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and T-SPOT CMV for measuring CMV-specific T-cell responses in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving letermovir prophylaxis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Human Cytomegalovirus Infection in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients and CAR T Cell Recipients - PART 1: Risk Factors, Clinical Impact and Immune Response.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- The Changing Paradigm in Infectious Diseases-Host-Directed Medicine: Implications for the Next Generation of ID Physicians.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- A multiparameter whole blood platform for assessment of anti-CMV immunity in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Early CMV DNAemia during letermovir prophylaxis predicts lower risk of late CMV infection and is associated with enhanced T-cell immunity after alloHSCT.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined cytomegalovirus-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) to pp65 and IE-1 at 100 days after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) following discontinuation of letermovir prophylaxis using ELISPOT (T-SPOT®.CMV, Oxford-Immunotec, Abingdon, UK). We compared ELISPOT results to a laboratory-developed intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay and characterized thresholds for the prediction of late clinically significant (cs)CMV infection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. We identified factors associated with high (i.e., at or above threshold) CMV-CMI to both antigens. ELISPOT correlated well with polyfunctional CMV-specific T-cell immunity by ICS. We defined thresholds of 67 and 4 spots per 250,000 cells for pp65 and IE-1, respectively, for predicting late csCMV infection. PBSC graft source, CMV seropositive donor, and/or CMV reactivation in the first 100 days post-HCT were associated with high CMV-CMI to pp65 and/or IE-1. Patients with high CMV-CMI to both antigens at day 100 had a lower incidence of late csCMV infection, however, late changes in immunosuppression affected risk prediction. Clinical risk factors (e.g., early CMV infection, acute graft-versus-host disease) predicted late csCMV and improved the predictive value of CMV-CMI testing. Thus, standardized CMV-CMI, after HCT, combined with clinical factors can be used to accurately stratify the risk of late csCMV infection after letermovir prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.