ArticleBiomedical engineering online2025
Keypoint localization and parameter measurement in ultrasound biomicroscopy anterior segment images based on deep learning.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate measurement of anterior segment parameters is crucial for diagnosing and managing ophthalmic conditions, such as glaucoma, cataracts, and refractive errors. However, traditional clinical measurement methods are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and susceptible to inaccuracies. With the growing potential of artificial intelligence in ophthalmic diagnostics, this study aims to develop and evaluate a deep learning model capable of automatically extracting key points and precisely measuring multiple clinically significant anterior segment parameters from ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images. These parameters include central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), pupil diameter (PD), angle-to-angle distance (ATA), sulcus-to-sulcus distance (STS), lens thickness (LT), and crystalline lens rise (CLR).
methodsA data set of 716 UBM anterior segment images was collected from Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital. YOLOv8 was utilized to segment four key anatomical structures: cornea-sclera, anterior chamber, pupil, and iris-ciliary body-thereby enhancing the accuracy of keypoint localization. Only images with intact posterior capsule lentis were selected to create an effective data set for parameter measurement. Ten keypoints were localized across the data set, allowing the calculation of seven essential parameters. Control experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of segmentation on measurement accuracy, with model predictions compared against clinical gold standards.
resultsThe segmentation model achieved a mean IoU of 0.8836 and mPA of 0.9795. Following segmentation, the binary classification model attained an mAP of 0.9719, with a precision of 0.9260 and a recall of 0.9615. Keypoint localization exhibited a Euclidean distance error of 58.73 ± 63.04 μm, improving from the pre-segmentation error of 71.57 ± 67.36 μm. Localization mAP was 0.9826, with a precision of 0.9699, a recall of 0.9642 and an FPS of 32.64. In addition, parameter error analysis and Bland-Altman plots demonstrated improved agreement with clinical gold standards after segmentation.
conclusionsThis deep learning approach for UBM image segmentation, keypoint localization, and parameter measurement is feasible, enhancing clinical diagnostic efficiency for anterior segment parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.