Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330133›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

How to improve the potential of microalgal biostimulants for abiotic stress mitigation in plants?

Bram Vangenechten, Barbara De Coninck, Johan Ceusters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biochemical shifts inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bram VangenechtenResearch Group for Sustainable Crop Production & Protection, Division of Crop Biotechnics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Geel, Belgium.
Barbara De ConinckKU Leuven Plant Institute (LPI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan CeustersResearch Group for Sustainable Crop Production & Protection, Division of Crop Biotechnics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Geel, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stress is among the most critical factors limiting crop productivity worldwide and its importance is further exacerbated by climate change. In recent years, microalgal biostimulants have gained attention for their potential to enhance plant resilience towards abiotic stress. However, significant hurdles still persist, particularly regarding the unknown modes of action of microalgal biostimulants, which is a concern for stringent regulatory requirements and product reliability. The aim of this review is to improve the potential of microalgal biostimulants for abiotic stress mitigation in plants by addressing different key parameters shaping the efficacy of microalgal biostimulants, encompassing cultivation approaches, extraction techniques, and application methods. Furthermore, it also highlights how microalgal biostimulants modulate plant morphology, physiology and biochemistry under drought, salinity, and heat stress-three predominant stressors anticipated to intensify under climate change. Notably, these biostimulants consistently enhance drought stress tolerance by improving biomass accumulation, nutrient uptake, and water use efficiency through enhanced photosynthesis and stomatal regulation. These effects are largely driven by the accumulation of osmoprotectants and antioxidant compounds. In contrast, salt stress mitigation is highly species-dependent, with some microalgae enhancing stress tolerance through osmoprotectant and antioxidant accumulation, while others reduce these compounds, potentially lowering stress perception via unknown mechanisms. Despite the significance of the abiotic stress, heat stress mitigation by microalgal biostimulants remains an underexplored research area. Additionally, indirect applications of microalgae-ranging from biotechnological innovations to desalination-underscore the broader potential of these organisms in agricultural resilience. Collectively, this review identifies three key gaps in the existing literature-the diversity gap, the practical gap, and the research gap-while outlining promising avenues for future research in microalgal biostimulant development.

Indexed as

abiotic stressbiostimulantdroughtheatmicroalgaesaltstress tolerancesustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID40330133
PMCPMC12053235

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.