Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

High-resolution vessel wall imaging-driven radiomic analysis for the precision prediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk: a promising approach.

Wenqing Yuan, Shuangyan Jiang, Zihang Wang, Chang Yan, Yongxiang Jiang, Dajing Guo, Ting Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenqing Yuan *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shuangyan Jiang *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zihang WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chang YanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yongxiang JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dajing GuoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ting ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to extract the radiomic features of intracranial aneurysm (IA) and parent artery (PA) walls from high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) images and construct and validate machine learning (ML) predictive models by comparing them with the radiomics score (Rad-score). Methods: In this study, 356 IAs from 306 patients were retrospectively analyzed at Yuzhong Center and randomly divided into training and test cohorts in an 8:2 ratio. Additionally, 66 IAs from 58 patients were used at Jiangnan Center to validate the predictive model. Radiomic features of the IA and PA walls were extracted from the contrast-enhanced HR-VWI images. Univariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses were performed on the training cohort features to identify optimal rupture-associated features. The Rad-score model was constructed by calculating the total score derived from the weighted sum of optimal radiomic features, and three ML models were built using the XGBoost, LightGBM, and CART algorithms, and evaluated using both the test and external validation cohorts. Results: Eight optimal IA wall features and four PA wall features were identified. The Rad-score model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.858, 0.800, and 0.770 for the training, test, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Among the three ML models, the XGBoost model performed best across all cohorts, with AUC values of 0.983, 0.891, and 0.864, respectively. Compared to the Rad-score model, the XGBoost model exhibited superior AUC values ( Conclusion: The radiomic features extracted from HR-VWI images demonstrated robust predictive utility for IA rupture risk in both the Rad-score and ML models. The XGBoost-based ML model outperformed the Rad-score model in efficacy and performance, and proved to be a noninvasive, efficient, and accurate tool for identifying high-risk IA patients.

Indexed as

high-resolution vessel wall imagingintracranial aneurysmmachine learningradiomicsrupture

Identifiers

PMID40330633
PMCPMC12052944

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.