Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40330715›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2025

AI-driven early diagnosis of specific mental disorders: a comprehensive study.

Firuze Damla Eryılmaz Baran, Meric Cetin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. GerenciaVida: Validity Evidence of a Mobile Application for Suicide Behavior Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Firuze Damla Eryılmaz BaranDepartment of Computer Engineering, Pamukkale University, 20160 Denizli, Turkey.
Meric CetinDepartment of Computer Engineering, Pamukkale University, 20160 Denizli, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the areas where artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are used is the detection and diagnosis of mental disorders. AI approaches, including machine learning and deep learning models, can identify early signs of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, depression, suicidality, and dementia by analyzing speech patterns, behaviors, and physiological data. These approaches increase diagnostic accuracy and enable timely intervention, which is crucial for effective treatment. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of AI approaches applied to mental disorder detection using various data sources, such as survey, Electroencephalography (EEG) signal, text and image. Applications include predicting anxiety and depression levels in online games, detecting schizophrenia from EEG signals, detecting autism spectrum disorder, analyzing text-based indicators of suicidality and depression, and diagnosing dementia from magnetic resonance imaging images. eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor were designed as machine learning models, and convolutional neural networks (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) models suitable for the dataset were designed as deep learning models. Data preprocessing techniques such as wavelet transforms, normalization, clustering were used to optimize model performances, and hyperparameter optimization and feature extraction were performed. While the LightGBM technique had the highest performance with 96% accuracy for anxiety and depression prediction, the optimized SVM stood out with 97% accuracy. Autism spectrum disorder classification reached 98% accuracy with XGBoost, RF and LightGBM. The LSTM model achieved a high accuracy of 83% in schizophrenia diagnosis. The GRU model showed the best performance with 93% accuracy in text-based suicide and depression detection. In the detection of dementia, LSTM and GRU models have demonstrated their effectiveness in data analysis by reaching 99% accuracy. The findings of the study highlight the effectiveness of LSTM and GRU for sequential data analysis and their applicability in medical imaging or natural language processing. XGBoost and LightGBM are noted to be highly accurate ML tools for clinical diagnoses. In addition, hyperparameter optimization and advanced data pre-processing approaches are confirmed to significantly improve model performance. The results obtained with this study have revealed the potential to improve clinical decision support systems for mental disorders with AI, facilitating early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical decision support systemsDeep learningMachine learningMental disorders

Identifiers

PMID40330715
PMCPMC12052716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.