ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2025
AI-driven early diagnosis of specific mental disorders: a comprehensive study.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Non-coding RNAs as central regulators of phytohormone signaling in plant abiotic stress responses.Plant molecular biology · 2026Review
- Influence of recurrence risk perception on depressive mood in first-time stroke patients and the mediating effect of coping styles and perceived discrimination.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From predictive algorithms to generative intelligence: a decadal bibliometric mapping of global research frontiers in AI-driven mental health (2016-2025).Australian journal of psychology · 2026Review
- Exploring AI-assisted design of executive function rehabilitation programs for individuals with ADHD: a mixed-methods evaluation of prompts and chatgpt outputs.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- GerenciaVida: Validity Evidence of a Mobile Application for Suicide Behavior Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Biomarkers in Schizophrenia: Current Approaches and New Developments-A Literature Review.Behavioural neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the areas where artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are used is the detection and diagnosis of mental disorders. AI approaches, including machine learning and deep learning models, can identify early signs of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, depression, suicidality, and dementia by analyzing speech patterns, behaviors, and physiological data. These approaches increase diagnostic accuracy and enable timely intervention, which is crucial for effective treatment. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of AI approaches applied to mental disorder detection using various data sources, such as survey, Electroencephalography (EEG) signal, text and image. Applications include predicting anxiety and depression levels in online games, detecting schizophrenia from EEG signals, detecting autism spectrum disorder, analyzing text-based indicators of suicidality and depression, and diagnosing dementia from magnetic resonance imaging images. eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor were designed as machine learning models, and convolutional neural networks (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) models suitable for the dataset were designed as deep learning models. Data preprocessing techniques such as wavelet transforms, normalization, clustering were used to optimize model performances, and hyperparameter optimization and feature extraction were performed. While the LightGBM technique had the highest performance with 96% accuracy for anxiety and depression prediction, the optimized SVM stood out with 97% accuracy. Autism spectrum disorder classification reached 98% accuracy with XGBoost, RF and LightGBM. The LSTM model achieved a high accuracy of 83% in schizophrenia diagnosis. The GRU model showed the best performance with 93% accuracy in text-based suicide and depression detection. In the detection of dementia, LSTM and GRU models have demonstrated their effectiveness in data analysis by reaching 99% accuracy. The findings of the study highlight the effectiveness of LSTM and GRU for sequential data analysis and their applicability in medical imaging or natural language processing. XGBoost and LightGBM are noted to be highly accurate ML tools for clinical diagnoses. In addition, hyperparameter optimization and advanced data pre-processing approaches are confirmed to significantly improve model performance. The results obtained with this study have revealed the potential to improve clinical decision support systems for mental disorders with AI, facilitating early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.