ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Potential synergistic effects of lenvatinib and aspirin in aortic dissection: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multifaceted Small Molecules as Enzyme Modulators: Cases of Drug Discovery/Repurposing Illustrating Nature's Pragmatism.BioMed research international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although numerous anticancer drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are commonly used in clinical practice, life-threatening drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving these drugs are rarely reported. Case summary: A male patient had been taking aspirin for two years following a stroke. He was subsequently diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and initiated lenvatinib therapy. Shortly after, he developed lenvatinib-induced hypertension (191/102 mmHg) and was prescribed amlodipine for blood pressure control. At his first routine follow-up for HCC treatment, he was asymptomatic but was incidentally diagnosed with acute aortic dissection (AD). The patient declined endovascular treatment, and his AD lesions remained temporarily stable. Although lenvatinib is generally considered a safe and effective option for advanced HCC, this case raises concerns about a potential link between lenvatinib and aspirin in the development of AD due to their temporal association. This case highlights the need for increased clinical awareness regarding possible DDIs between these two drugs, particularly in patients with untreated acute AD. Conclusion: The concurrent use of lenvatinib and aspirin may increase the risk of AD in patients with cancer. To prevent life-threatening complications, patients receiving both therapies should be closely monitored and strictly adhere to treatment guidelines. For patients who decline invasive AD treatment, continued lenvatinib therapy might be a cost-effective option to improve prognosis, though the continuation of aspirin therapy requires careful consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.