ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Risk Factors for Postpartum Hemorrhage Following Vaginal Deliveries in China: A Case-Control Study of Second Births After IUD Removal.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following vaginal delivery, with a special focus on the impact of intrauterine device (IUD) usage in the context of recent policy changes allowing more childbirths in China. Methods: A total of 6879 women who underwent vaginal deliveries from January 2021 to December 2023 in the Lianyungang regional maternal care system and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. A case-control design was employed, comprising 524 women with PPH (blood loss ≥500 mL) 24h after giving birth and an equal number of controls (blood loss <500 mL) matched on a 1:1 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, alongside ROC curve analysis, were conducted to identify risk factors for PPH. Results: Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in age (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.35-2.57, P < 0.01), number of miscarriages (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.46-2.65, P < 0.001), gestational week, number of fetuses, weight of the second child (OR = 10.78, 95% CI: 7.88-14.75, P < 0.001), placental adhesion, and uterine atony (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.60-3.61, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed regarding occupation, educational level, mode of first delivery, IUD use and duration, and presence of gestational diabetes or hypertension (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified age, number of miscarriages, weight of the second child, and uterine atony as independent risk factors for PPH (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the combined predictive value of these factors was superior, with an AUC of 0.805 for the combined predictive model. Conclusion: PPH is influenced by advanced maternal age, multiple miscarriages, high birth weight, and uterine atony. IUD use may not independently impact the likelihood of PPH under the conditions studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.