Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40331569›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2025

Lipoprotein(a) and recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular events: the US Family Heart Database.

Diane E MacDougall, Anne Tybjærg-Hansen, Joshua W Knowles, Theresa P Stern, Bonnie K Hartsuff, Mary P McGowan, Seth J Baum, Katherine A Wilemon, Børge G Nordestgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A Facial Foundation Model for Clinical Biomarker Prediction and Real-World Mobile Deployment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Focus on lipoprotein(a).European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diane E MacDougallDepartment of Research, Family Heart Foundation, 5548 First Coast Hwy, Fernandina Beach, FL 32034, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-7332-4185
Anne Tybjærg-HansenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Joshua W KnowlesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Institute and Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Theresa P SternBIA Clinical Group, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Bonnie K HartsuffBIA Clinical Group, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mary P McGowanDepartment of Research, Family Heart Foundation, 5548 First Coast Hwy, Fernandina Beach, FL 32034, USA.
Seth J BaumFlourish Research, Apex, NC, USA.
Katherine A WilemonDepartment of Research, Family Heart Foundation, 5548 First Coast Hwy, Fernandina Beach, FL 32034, USA.
Børge G NordestgaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1954-7220

Funding

Family Heart Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsHigher levels of lipoprotein(a) drive increasing risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in otherwise healthy individuals regardless of sex and race/ethnicity. This study aimed to evaluate whether this is also true for recurrent ASCVD, and whether LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy possibly mitigates such a relationship.

methodsIn US medical claims between 2012 and 2022 for 340 million individuals, 273 770 had diagnosed ASCVD and lipoprotein(a) measured in nmol/L. These women (n = 117 269; 43%) and men (n = 156 501; 57%) included Black (n = 22 451; 8%), Hispanic (n = 24 606; 9%), and White (n = 161 165; 59%) individuals.

resultsLipoprotein(a) levels were higher in women vs men and in Black vs Hispanic and White individuals. During a median follow-up of 5.4 years, 41 687 individuals (15%) experienced recurrent ASCVD. Higher lipoprotein(a) levels were associated with continuously increasing risk of recurrent ASCVD. Compared to individuals with lipoprotein(a) < 15 nmol/L, the adjusted hazard ratios for recurrent ASCVD events were 1.04 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.07) for 15-79 nmol/L, 1.15 (1.12-1.19) for 80-179 nmol/L, 1.29 (1.25-1.33) for 180-299 nmol/L, and 1.45 (1.39-1.51) for ≥300 nmol/L. Results were similar for individual ASCVD components, and in sex, race/ethnicity, baseline ASCVD, and diabetes subgroups; however, high impact LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy possibly mitigates the deleterious effect of lipoprotein(a) ≥ 180 nmol/L, most pronounced in those on PCSK9 inhibitors. Interaction on recurrent ASCVD events between lipoprotein(a) categories and sex, race/ethnicity, baseline ASCVD, diabetes, and impact of LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy use had P-values of .61, .06, .33, .91, and 2 × 10-8, respectively.

conclusionsIn 273 770 individuals with ASCVD, higher lipoprotein(a) levels were associated with continuously increasing risk of recurrent ASCVD events regardless of sex and race/ethnicity that may have been partially mitigated by high impact LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisLipoprotein(a)AdultAgedCholesterol, LDLDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesCholesterol, LDLLipoprotein(a)EthnicityLipoprotein(a)RaceRecurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseSex

Identifiers

PMID40331569
PMCPMC12634116

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.