Observational studyHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Assessment of physicians' perception of pediatrics respiratory syncytial virus disease and preferences for immunization strategies in the United States.
Observational study in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of pediatricians in Crete, Greece, regarding RSV immunization: a cross-sectional study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Review
- Pediatricians' attitudes and knowledge of RSV immunization products: A multi-country cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infection in infants and young children, placing substantial burden on patients, their families, and health systems. This observational, cross-sectional, web-based, survey study in the United States (during October - November 2023) assessed physicians' perceptions of RSV disease and new immunization strategies, including their preferences for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and maternal immunizations as RSV preventive measures. Immunization preferences were quantified through discrete choice experiment (DCE). Physicians aged ≥ 18 years, who spent at least 60% of their time in direct patient care and worked in a practice providing immunization to patients aged ≤ 2 years were recruited through online panels. Eighty pediatricians and 20 family practitioners participated. Mean (SD) age of physicians was 52.3 (12.7) years; majority were male (64.0%). Most physicians strongly agreed with supporting all types of recommended childhood immunizations (77.0%) and were aware of new RSV immunization strategies under development or recently approved (91.0%). A majority moderately/strongly agreed that maternal immunization and mAbs provide protection to the baby (77.0% and 87.0%, respectively). In DCE, physicians chose RSV immunization 96.1% of the time vs no immunization (3.9%). The most important attributes that drove physicians' preferences were: increasing durability of protection from 90 to 180 days (24.9%), increasing efficacy against RSV hospitalization from 57% to 80% (20.9%), and increasing efficacy against medically-attended RSV from 51% to 80% (20.2%). Understanding physicians' attitudes and preferences regarding RSV immunization strategies is important as new RSV prevention methods become available and are introduced into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.