ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025
Inflammatory Skin Diseases: The Importance of Immunological Signatures.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Phytocompounds and the Physiological Response of the Skin in Common Dermatological Conditions: A Narrative Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Trends.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Problems associated with the ATC system of drug classification.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- JAK-STAT pathway-associated skin diseases: a refined functional framework for inflammatory skin diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe understanding and classification of inflammatory skin diseases is shifting from a historical-descriptive perspective to a molecular-pathophysiological one based on immune response patterns. These are derived from a few key immunological mediators, each of which induces its own characteristic clinical, histopathological, and molecular patterns in the skin.
methodsThis discussion of the definition of the immune response patterns of inflammatory skin diseases is based on information from pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search. A systematic literature search was also conducted on the response of inflammatory skin diseases to treatment with specific biologic agents.
resultsThe described immune response patterns are: autoinflammation; type 1, cytotoxic; type 2a, eczematous; type 2b, blistering; type 3, psoriasiform; type 4a, fibrosing; and type 4b, granulomatous. Each signature can usually be treated in a targeted manner. In general, each therapeutic target structure is associated with an adequate treatment response if and only if the skin disease under treatment has the relevant signature type. Hardly any biomarkers are currently available for the determination of immune response patterns in routine clinical practice.
conclusionThe classification of inflammatory skin diseases by their immune response patterns opens up the prospect of specifically targeted immunotherapy for each immune response pattern regardless of the historical-descriptive disease entity. Targeting is intended to improve response rates. Initial findings suggest that this strategy is likely to succeed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.