ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Robot-assisted minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSacrocolpopexy is a well-established surgical procedure for treatment of female genital prolapse and complex pelvic floor disorders. The introduction of robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery has further optimised the precision, invasiveness and efficiency of the procedure. PURPOSE: This review analyses the indications, surgical techniques, outcomes and management of complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
resultsRobot-assisted sacrocolpopexy shows comparable anatomical and functional results to laparoscopic and open surgical approaches. Compared to laparotomy, minimally invasive techniques reduce perioperative morbidity and accelerate postoperative recovery.
conclusionDespite promising results, the treatment decision for robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy must be individually tailored to the severity of the prolapse, location of the prolapse, symptoms and availability of alternative treatment options under consideration of economic aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40332595What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.