SynthesisThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
Endogenous Sex Steroid Hormones, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, and Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
Synthesis in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endogenous sex steroid hormones, sex hormone binding globulin and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with established cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Low Free Testosterone Is Independently Associated With Long-Term Mortality in Men With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Andrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile abundant research suggests a sex-specific role of endogenous sex steroid hormones in chronic diseases, research on mortality remains inconclusive. We quantified the sex-specific associations of endogenous sex steroid hormones, including total testosterone (TT), free testosterone, bioavailable testosterone, estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and DHEA sulfate (DHEAS), and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) with risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population.
methodsEmbase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched and population-based cohort studies investigating the association of interest were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI were calculated using a random effects model for the top vs bottom tertile of sex hormones and risk of mortality.
resultsThe systematic review included 53 publications with 359 047 participants. A significant association was observed between higher level of TT and risk of all-cause mortality (HR [95% CI]: 0.89 [0.83-0.97], n = 19 studies) in men, while no association was found in women. Dose-response analysis suggested a significant U-shaped association between TT and all-cause mortality in men and a J-shaped association in women. Higher SHBG level was significantly associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality in women (1.25 [1.13-1.39], n = 3) and no association was observed in men. Additionally, higher DHEAS levels were associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality in men (0.72 [0.57-0.91], n = 6) and no association was observed in women.
conclusionThis meta-analysis reveals a dose-response link between endogenous sex steroid hormones and mortality, highlighting the need for sex-specific studies on hormone modulation's impact on mortality and longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.