Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40333592›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

PLM-ATG: Identification of Autophagy Proteins by Integrating Protein Language Model Embeddings with PSSM-Based Features.

Yangying Wang, Chunhua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yangying WangCollege of Information Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Chunhua WangCollege of Information Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.ORCID 0009-0008-1448-3169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy critically regulates cellular development while maintaining pathophysiological homeostasis. Since the autophagic process is tightly regulated by the coordination of autophagy-related proteins (ATGs), precise identification of these proteins is essential. Although current computational approaches have addressed experimental recognition's costly and time-consuming challenges, they still have room for improvement since handcrafted features inadequately capture the intricate patterns and relationships hidden in sequences. In this study, we propose PLM-ATG, a novel computational model that integrates support vector machines with the fusion of protein language model (PLM) embeddings and position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM)-based features for the ATG identification. First, we extracted sequence-based features and PSSM-based features as the inputs of six classifiers to establish baseline models. Among these, the combination of the SVM classifier and the AADP-PSSM feature set achieved the best prediction accuracy. Second, two popular PLM embeddings, i.e., ESM-2 and ProtT5, were fused with the AADP-PSSM features to further improve the prediction of ATGs. Third, we selected the optimal feature subset from the combination of the ESM-2 embeddings and AADP-PSSM features to train the final SVM model. The proposed PLM-ATG achieved an accuracy of 99.5% and an MCC of 0.990, which are nearly 5% and 0.1 higher than those of the state-of-the-art model EnsembleDL-ATG, respectively.

Indexed as

AutophagyAutophagy-Related ProteinsComputational BiologyAlgorithmsHumansPosition-Specific Scoring MatricesSupport Vector MachineAutophagy-Related Proteinsautophagy proteinsposition-specific scoring matrixprotein language modelsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID40333592
PMCPMC12029579

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.