ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Attitudes and practices for antibiotic prescription and antimicrobial resistance among general physicians -Findings from a multi-country survey.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Resistance Awareness and Prescribing Behavior Among General Practitioners in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the attitudes, and practices (AP) of general physicians (GPs) regarding antibiotic prescribing and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A cross-sectional, descriptive AP study was conducted by surveying GPs treating community acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs) across nine countries, including India, Pakistan, Algeria, Thailand, Vietnam, Egypt, Morocco, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia. A 29-item, web-based questionnaire was used to collect data between October-2023 and December-2023. Overall, 9249/14207 invited GPs responded, and 1008 responses were included in the analysis after quality control (3341 terminated due to eligibility, 4764 dropped out without completion, 136 excluded for quality concern). Of the included respondents, 78.8% were male and 98% were aged ≥35 years. 41% of GPs agreed, 33% disagreed, and 27% were neutral to questions regarding whether or not antibiotics are helpful in treating infectious respiratory diseases. In total, 62% of GPs agreed that AMR is a concern in their country and 63% agreed that prescribing antibiotics in primary care results in AMR. Pregnant women and patients with comorbidities were populations for whom selecting an appropriate antibiotic was most challenging; 38% of GPs found prescribing antibiotics to children was difficult. Difficulty in correlating susceptibility data (53%), limited availability of information on antibiotics (52%), and lack of availability of appropriate antibiotics (51%) were important challenges for appropriate antibiotic selection. Overall, 94% of GPs agreed that there is a need for frequent training on antibiotic therapy, with 33% and 49% recommending quarterly and biannual trainings, respectively. This study identified current practices, and possible gaps in appropriate antibiotic prescribing for RTIs. As an outcome, specific training needs could be identified to assist GPs with appropriate antibiotic prescribing in an outpatient setting.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.