ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Novel Compounds Affecting the Genome Editing Efficiency of CRISPR System.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating HTS and CRISPR/Cas for next-generation nucleic and non-nucleic acid diagnostics.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome editing is a promising therapeutic strategy for genetic disorders by modifying the genome precisely, especially the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, a major limitation of CRISPR/Cas9 in gene therapy is the biosafety issues caused by off-target effects. Compounds that can modulate the genome editing efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, especially those reducing the off-target effects, are potentially useful pharmacological tools for improving the effectiveness and safety of genome editing. Here, we performed high-throughput screening in HEK 293FT cells to discover compounds that decrease or increase the genome editing efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system from 9930 compounds. After two rounds of screening, we identified that CP-724714, a ErbB2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, decreased the CRISPR/Cas9 efficiency and reduced the off-target effects by suppressing the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9, and was thus named a CRISPR decelerator (or inhibitor), while Clofarabine, a DNA synthesis inhibitor, increased the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9, and was named a CRISPR accelerator. We further identified four compounds (Tranilast, Cerulenin, Rosolic acid and Resveratrol) that affected the efficiency of single-strand annealing (SSA) repair. Among them, Tranilast, Cerulenin and Rosolic acid are potential SSA decelerators, while Resveratrol is a potential SSA accelerator. These identified compounds may be useful in optimizing mammalian genetic manipulation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.