ArticlePloS one2025
Cohabitation in sub-Saharan Africa: Does women empowerment matter? Insights from the demographic and health survey.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Women's empowerment measurements in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Modeling of Years of Cohabitation, Children Ever Born, and Number of Living Children of Women of Reproductive Age Using Trivariate Poisson Regression.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCohabitation is increasingly challenging traditional family structures in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), marking a significant cultural shift in the region. This rise in non-traditional unions prompts an exploration into the underlying factors, particularly the influence of women's empowerment. Despite the growing prevalence of cohabitation, there remains a notable gap in research examining its connection to women empowerment. This study aims to bridge that gap by investigating the intricate relationship between key indicators of women's empowerment and cohabitation in SSA, offering fresh insights into how changing gender dynamics may be reshaping intimate partnerships in the region.
methodsThe study is a secondary data analysis of the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data of 13 SSA countries. A sample of 124,183 women between the ages of 15 and 49 having information on the outcome of interest were included in the analysis. Descriptive and inferential analyses, including proportions, Pearson's Chi-squared test, and multivariable logistic regression models, were employed to examine the association between women's empowerment indicators and cohabitation. The final regression model is presented in adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsWe found that cohabitation among women varies widely in SSA, with an overall prevalence of 10.9%-ranging from 50.6% in Liberia to just 0.1% in Senegal. We observed that women with higher levels of acceptance of spousal violence, greater decision-making capacity, and increased general knowledge level were more likely to enter cohabiting relationships. In contrast, women aged 25 and above, those residing in rural areas, those from wealthier households, and those with religious affiliations were less likely to cohabit. Additionally, women whose partners had primary or secondary education had higher odds of cohabitation compared to their counterparts whose partners had no formal education.
conclusionWe conclude that women's empowerment plays a significant role in the rising cohabitation rates in SSA. We postulate that addressing adolescent pregnancies could have a significant impact on reducing the practice of cohabitation among women of reproductive age in SSA. Research directions require longitudinal studies to understand the evolving relationship between empowerment and relationship choices, as well as qualitative inquiries to reveal underlying motivations, and comparative analyses across diverse cultural contexts to deepen insights into the interplay between empowerment and cohabitation decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.