Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335451›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2025

Genetic Sketch of Parkinson's Disease in India.

Suvorit S Bhowmick, Soaham D Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suvorit S BhowmickMovement Disorders Clinic, Vadodara Institute of Neurological Sciences, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Soaham D DesaiDepartment of Neurology, Shree Krishna Hospital, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractBy the current estimates, India is likely to face an alarmingly high burden of Parkinson's disease (PD) in the next two decades. Untangling the pathophysiology of PD through genetic research is the key to precision medicine and prevention strategies. This narrative review serves dual purpose of recapitulating phenomenology of monogenic diseases presenting with parkinsonism and synthesizing knowledge on PD genetics gained through research in India over the past two decades. Recent studies have detected rare genetic variants in 15%-20% of the early-onset PD patients in India. Due to lack of segregation analysis and functional validation, a vast majority of these remain as variants of uncertain significance. Nevertheless, several potentially pathogenic variants detected in the Indian PD patients are not yet cited in the global genetic databases such as Movement Disorder Society Genetic mutation database. Biallelic mutations (pathogenic single-nucleotide variants and copy number variants) in the PRKN gene account for 3%-5% of monogenic early-onset PD in the Indian population. About 2%-3% of the Indian EOPD patients carry pathogenic variants in the genes associated with atypical parkinsonism, such as PLA2G6 , suggesting that initially, they may be indistinguishable from monogenic PD. Up to 10% of the PD patients in India carry heterozygous pathogenic variants in GBA1 , a risk factor gene. Genetic research in India has several critical gaps, such as uneven geographic or ethnic representation, discrepancies in variant classification, and lack of large-scale genome-wide association studies. Sustained nationwide as well as international collaborative efforts are needed to bridge these gaps and foster translational science.

Indexed as

GeneticsIndiaparkinsonian disorders

Identifiers

PMID40335451
PMCPMC12393855

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.