Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335527›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

EEG-based neurodegenerative disease diagnosis: comparative analysis of conventional methods and deep learning models.

B R Nayana, M N Pavithra, S Chaitra, T N Bhuvana Mohini, Thompson Stephan, Vijay Mohan, Neha Agarwal

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B R NayanaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
M N PavithraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
S ChaitraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
T N Bhuvana MohiniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Thompson StephanThumbay College of Management and AI in Healthcare, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Vijay MohanDepartment of Mechatronics, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. vijay.mohan@manipal.edu.
Neha AgarwalSchool of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea. cheneha9@yu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of lifestyle changes, stress and other environmental factors have resulted in the sudden hike in dementia globally. This necessitates investigations with respect to every horizon of the due cause for it; further on, the diagnosis and treatments can be advanced with the aid of technology. This work attempts to conduct one such investigation on dementia diagnosis based on EEG signals. The implementation is carried out under three different verticals. Firstly, a conventional machine learning model was developed post-pre-processing, and feature extraction from the power spectral density was done using a Random Forest classifier. Second, 1D Convolutional Neural Networks models are developed, and pre-processed EEG signals are fed as input. Third, stacked spectrogram images are computed from decomposed EEG signals and are fed to 2D CNN models for classification. The investigations are performed on three different benchmark datasets. Across three datasets, the class labels include cognitively normal, frontotemporal dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's. The study offers a comparative evaluation across three distinct datasets, illustrating that deep learning models, particularly 1D and 2D CNNs, consistently outperform conventional methods in recognizing subtle EEG signal patterns linked to neurodegenerative conditions. For instance, in Dataset 1, the 2D CNN achieved the highest accuracy of 91.13%, surpassing the Random Forest model's 84.78% accuracy. Nevertheless, the investigation also points out challenges in Dataset 3, indicating the necessity for further model optimization tailored to specific datasets. Statistical tests validate the findings. This study showcases a comparative investigation of the potential of deep learning models vs. conventional classifiers in clinical environments for the early diagnosis of dementia.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectroencephalographyNeurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionFrontotemporal DementiaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerDecompositionDeep learningDementiaFeature extractionPower spectral densitySpectrogram

Identifiers

PMID40335527
PMCPMC12058994

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.