Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40335770›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2025

From avoidance to new action: the multifaceted role of the striatal indirect pathway.

Jaeeon Lee, Bernardo L Sabatini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jaeeon Lee *Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Bernardo L Sabatini *Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. bsabatini@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0095-9177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hallmark of optimal reinforcement learning is that an agent learns to avoid actions that lead to negative outcomes while still exploring alternative actions that could lead to better outcomes. Although the basal ganglia have been hypothesized to contribute to this computation, the mechanisms by which they do so are still unclear. Here, we focus on the function of the striatal indirect pathway and propose that it is regulated by a synaptic plasticity rule that allows an animal to avoid actions that lead to suboptimal outcomes. We consider current theories of striatal indirect pathway function in light of recent experimental findings and discuss studies that suggest that indirect pathway activity is potentiated by the suppression of dopamine release in the striatum. Furthermore, we highlight recent studies showing that activation of the indirect pathway can trigger an action, allowing animals to explore new actions while suppressing suboptimal actions. We show how our framework can reconcile previously conflicting results regarding the indirect pathway and suggest experiments for future investigation.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningCorpus StriatumNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsDopamineHumansReinforcement, PsychologyDopamine

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.