ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Instagram, a source of information and education about dental implants?
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study assesses the teaching effect of social media on the topic of dental implants.
methodsA sample of 400 Instagram posts were collected, 100 each for one of the following hashtags #dentalimplants, #implantdentisitry, #implantsurgery and #implantology. They were examined regarding their likes, comments, author (dentist or practice or clinic, dental technician, company, Instagram page, patient), gender, form of presentation (image + text, video, text, image) and purpose of the post. Afterwards all posts were divided into "excellent", "good", "moderate" and "poor" teaching effect regarding dental implantology by 6 different evaluators with different levels of training in dentistry. 400 Instagram posts were collected, each with hashtags related to dental implants, analyzed over a year.
resultsMen authored 48.5% of the posts, women 21.75%, and posts of unknown gender 29.75%. Images were the most common post format at 69.75%, while texts were the least at 0.75%. Dentists posted most frequently (76.5%), followed by dental technicians (11.5%), with educational posts (9.5%) being the least common purpose. Additionally, the evaluation of educational quality by six assessors showed that poor ratings were most common (76.7%), while excellent ratings were the least frequent (3.3%).
conclusionCurrently, social media cannot be used to obtain quality information about dental implants. Nevertheless, social media as an information platform about health-related topics continues to grow and has an increasingly important role in the lives of patients and professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40335848What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.