ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Deep learning-based evaluation of the severity of mitral regurgitation in canine myxomatous mitral valve disease patients using digital stethoscope recordings.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Canine radiography and echocardiography sensor fusion for deep learning-based detection and classification of myxomatous mitral valve disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Respiratory Diseases in Dogs and Cats: A Systematic Review.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- MicroRNA Expression Profiling in Canine Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease Highlights Potential Diagnostic Tool and Molecular Pathways.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) represents the most prevalent cardiac disorder in dogs, frequently resulting in mitral regurgitation (MR) and congestive heart failure. Although echocardiography is the gold standard for diagnosis, it is an expensive tool that involves significant clinical training to ensure consistent application. Deep learning models offer an innovative approach to assessing MR using digital stethoscopic recordings, enabling early screening and precise prediction. Thus, in this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a convolutional neural network 6 (CNN6) in providing an objective alternative to traditional methods for assessing MR. This study, conducted at the Seoul National University Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, included 460 dogs with MMVD, classified according to the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine guidelines. Phonocardiogram signals were recorded using digital stethoscopes and analyzed using the deep models CNN6, patch-mix audio spectrogram transformer (PaSST), and residual neural network (ResNET38), which were trained to categorize MR severity into mild, moderate, and severe based on MINE score. Performance metrics were calculated to evaluate model effectiveness.
resultsThe CNN6-Fbank model achieved an accuracy of 94.12% [95% confidence interval (CI): 94.11-93.12], specificity of 97.30% (95% CI: 97.30-97.34), sensitivity of 94.12% (95% CI: 93.74-94.50), precision of 92.63% (95% CI: 92.29-92.97), and F1 score of 93.32% (95% CI: 93.05-93.59), outperforming the PaSST and ResNet38 models overall and demonstrating robust performance across most metrics.
conclusionsDeep learning models, particularly CNN6, can effectively assess MR severity in dogs with MMVD using digital stethoscope recordings. This approach provides a rapid, noninvasive, and reliable adjunct to echocardiography, potentially enhancing diagnosis and outcomes. Future studies should focus on broader clinical validation and real-time application of this technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.