Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336069›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

Preconception health knowledge, attitudes and behavioural intentions among adults: a multi-country study.

A Craig, K Mabetha, J Stephenson, D Schoenaker, S A Norris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A CraigSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Ashleigh.Craig@wits.ac.za.
K MabethaDSI‑NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J StephensonElizabeth Garrett Anderson UCL Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
D SchoenakerSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
S A NorrisSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreconception health-the health status of individuals prior to conception-is vital for positive pregnancy outcomes and long-term health. Despite its importance for maternal and infant well-being, it remains under-researched and often overlooked in global maternal and child healthcare.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey with adults (18-55 years old) from Kenya, South Africa, Malaysia, the United States, and the United Kingdom (n = 5000), gathering data on preconception health knowledge, attitudes, behavioural intent, and respondents' preferences regarding factors important before pregnancy and preferred sources of health information. A generalised structural equation model (gSEM) was constructed a priori to assess the relationship between socioeconomic position and preconception health knowledge, and whether this relationship was mediated by preconception attitudes and behavioural intent.

resultsPreconception health knowledge, attitudes, and behavioural intent showed significant variation across the countries. Over half of the respondents reported having adequate preconception knowledge (50.3%), with the USA having the highest proportion of respondents with good knowledge (13.8%) and Malaysia having the highest proportion with poor knowledge (42.5%). In the pooled sample, physical health was considered the most important factor before pregnancy, followed by relationships and family. Clinic doctors were the most preferred source of information, followed by nurses and obstetricians/gynaecologists. The relationship between preconception knowledge and behavioural intent was fully mediated by a combination of preconception attitudes (71.7%).

conclusionPreconception health knowledge, attitudes, and behavioural intent differed across the five economically diverse countries. Pregnancy factors were prioritised differently across settings, likely reflecting disparities in culture, socioeconomic status, and healthcare access, with varying preferences for sources of preconception health information. These findings underscore the importance of designing tailored interventions that consider socioeconomic and cultural differences to enhance overall health outcomes.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePreconception CareAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionKenyaMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedPregnancySouth AfricaUnited KingdomAttitudesBehavioural intentFactors important prior to pregnancyMulticountryPreconception health knowledgePreferred sources of health information

Identifiers

PMID40336069
PMCPMC12057062

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.