ArticleReproductive health2025
Preconception health knowledge, attitudes and behavioural intentions among adults: a multi-country study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organisation, Financing, and Implementation of Preconception Care in Primary Care: Implications for Women's Health and Well-Being.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Premarital Preventive Examinations and Access to Genetic Counselling in the South-Central Region of Bulgaria: Implications for Preconception and Child Health.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- State of Knowledge and Awareness of Preconception Preparedness among Premarital Couples in Rwanda: A Quantitative Cross-Sectional Survey.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and needs concerning fertility and preconceptional health in Germany-insights from a pilot survey.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- General practitioners' perspectives of caring for larger-bodied preconception women: A descriptive qualitative study.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreconception health-the health status of individuals prior to conception-is vital for positive pregnancy outcomes and long-term health. Despite its importance for maternal and infant well-being, it remains under-researched and often overlooked in global maternal and child healthcare.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey with adults (18-55 years old) from Kenya, South Africa, Malaysia, the United States, and the United Kingdom (n = 5000), gathering data on preconception health knowledge, attitudes, behavioural intent, and respondents' preferences regarding factors important before pregnancy and preferred sources of health information. A generalised structural equation model (gSEM) was constructed a priori to assess the relationship between socioeconomic position and preconception health knowledge, and whether this relationship was mediated by preconception attitudes and behavioural intent.
resultsPreconception health knowledge, attitudes, and behavioural intent showed significant variation across the countries. Over half of the respondents reported having adequate preconception knowledge (50.3%), with the USA having the highest proportion of respondents with good knowledge (13.8%) and Malaysia having the highest proportion with poor knowledge (42.5%). In the pooled sample, physical health was considered the most important factor before pregnancy, followed by relationships and family. Clinic doctors were the most preferred source of information, followed by nurses and obstetricians/gynaecologists. The relationship between preconception knowledge and behavioural intent was fully mediated by a combination of preconception attitudes (71.7%).
conclusionPreconception health knowledge, attitudes, and behavioural intent differed across the five economically diverse countries. Pregnancy factors were prioritised differently across settings, likely reflecting disparities in culture, socioeconomic status, and healthcare access, with varying preferences for sources of preconception health information. These findings underscore the importance of designing tailored interventions that consider socioeconomic and cultural differences to enhance overall health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.