Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40336085›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2025

Effectiveness of family health education in malaria elimination programmes: a scoping review.

Misra Helma Firdaus, Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh, Rosnah Sutan, Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Misra Helma FirdausDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000, Cheras Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. misrafirdaus@gmail.com.
Sharifa Ezat Wan PutehDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000, Cheras Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rosnah SutanDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000, Cheras Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Mohd Rizal Abdul ManafDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000, Cheras Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. mrizal@hctm.ukm.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains a significant global health issue, with vector control strategies likes indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) show promise, socio-cultural and structural challenges often hinder their success. Family and community involvement, including individual adherence, household leadership, and participation by community leaders, are crucial in enhancing intervention outcomes. This review evaluates family health education's effectiveness in improving public health impact on malaria elimination programmes.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, yielding 1,121 records through a predefined Population, Exposure, Outcome (PEO)-based search strategy. The review focused on studies published between 2019 and 2024 examining malaria elimination programmes and family health education. The Population consisted of families in malaria-endemic regions, particularly rural and urban areas of sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, including households with young children and pregnant women. The Exposure was participation in malaria elimination programmes, and the Outcome was the effectiveness of family health education in enhancing awareness, knowledge, and public health outcomes. Review articles, editorials, conference papers, and proceedings were excluded. Data extraction adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, and studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

resultsThis study examines the effectiveness of malaria health education programmes using a socio-ecological framework, focusing on individual, family, and community-level influences. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, exploring interventions likes IRS and ITN across diverse populations. At the individual level, educational programmes significantly enhanced malaria knowledge and prevention behaviours. Within families, health education strengthened decision-making and reinforced preventive measures. At the community level, engagement in malaria-related initiatives improved collective action, though policy barriers limited widespread implementation. The review employed various research designs, underscore the role of multi-stakeholder involvement in ensuring the effectiveness of malaria elimination programmes.

conclusionThis study highlights the important of family structure in malaria elimination emphasizing maternal leadership in decision-making and health-seeking behaviours. Integrating family health education into public health strategies can enhance intervention effectiveness, improve adherence and promote long-term sustainability. Future programmes should leverage maternal influence and community engagement to strengthen malaria elimination programmes' efforts.

Indexed as

Disease EradicationFamily HealthHealth EducationMalariaMosquito ControlHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansCommunity engagementFamily health educationMalaria eliminationPublic health interventionVector control

Identifiers

PMID40336085
PMCPMC12056992

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.