Evidence mapPaperPMID 40337123Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2024

Proceed with care and intention: Factors to consider when introducing a doctoral-level route to occupational therapy registration in the UK.

Jo Watson, Stephanie Tempest, Carolyn Hay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jo WatsonDr Jo Watson Consulting Ltd, Hampshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2395-0346
Stephanie Tempeststephanie tempest consultancy ltd, London, UK.
Carolyn HayHead of Education, Royal College of Occupational Therapists, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several United Kingdom Higher Education Institutions are seeking accreditation of new, doctoral entry routes to occupational therapy. This research explored stakeholder perspectives regarding the implications of introducing this additional pre-registration pathway. Method: A mixed-method design gathered data via four virtual events ( Findings: Participants agreed that introducing pre-registration doctorates was beneficial (68%) and an exciting opportunity with the potential to expedite evidence-base expansion (68%). Recognising the challenges, eight emergent themes coalesced into a statement guiding future work: 'It will take an ongoing commitment from all of us to influence, shape and take positive actions to make structural changes to enhance equity and justice into and within the profession encompassing the themes of value, visibility, viability, expectations, perceptions, equity and diversity, accessibility and clarity of vision. Continued dialogue and communication, with compassionate listening, is required for this'. Conclusion: An additional pre-registration doctoral route into United Kingdom occupational therapy is broadly welcomed, acknowledging the need for ongoing dialogue. The emergent themes provide a framework for proceeding with care and intention as discussions move towards implementation and may assist other nations having similar debates.

Indexed as

doctoral entryequity and diversityopportunities and challengesPre-registration education

Identifiers

PMID40337123
PMCPMC12033626

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.