ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Scores for Fibrotic MASH in a Cohort of Biopsy-proven MASLD Patients With Predominantly High BMI in the Primary Care Setting.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS) are used to predict fibrosis and steatosis in patients with or at risk for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). More recently, the fibrotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) index (FNI) and steatosis-associated fibrosis estimator (SAFE) have been created. We have compared the accuracy of these noninvasive scoring systems in MASLD patients. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 244 biopsy-proven MASLD patients from a tertiary health care system. Score performances were determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve with 95% confidence intervals, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: About 25 (10.3%) patients had fibrotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). The FNI score was best at predicting fibrotic MASH with an AUROC of 0.78, while NFS was the worst at predicting fibrotic NASH with an AUROC of 0.60. In the entire cohort, FNI of 0.33, FIB-4 of 2.67, SAFE >100, and NFS >0.675 had PPVs of 17%, 31%, 17%, and 16%, respectively, and NPVs of 97%, 92%, 96%, and 91%, respectively. Specificity was greatest for FIB4 at 92% and NFS at 86%, whereas the sensitivity was greatest for FNI and SAFE scores at 88% and 80%, respectively. Conclusion: FNI and SAFE scores have superior diagnostic accuracy for fibrotic MASH compared to other scoring systems. While liver biopsy remains the gold standard diagnostic method, noninvasive scores like FNI, and SAFE scores can be used in everyday clinical practice to assess for fibrotic MASH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.