ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Risk stratification and management of arrhythmias in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is a cardiac disorder characterized by an accessory pathway known as the bundle of Kent, which bypasses the atrioventricular node and predisposes patients to tachyarrhythmias, including supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. The prevalence of WPW syndrome ranges from 0.1% to 0.5% globally, with a higher incidence in males and diagnosis typically occurring between ages 10 and 30. Although many individuals remain asymptomatic, WPW presents a risk of life-threatening arrhythmias, including sudden cardiac death, particularly when atrial fibrillation progresses to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Effective risk stratification is essential for managing WPW syndrome; this involves evaluating symptomatic presentation, accessory pathway properties, and underlying cardiac conditions using clinical, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiological data. Recent advances in risk stratification models enable clinicians to identify better patients at high risk for arrhythmia recurrence or sudden death, informing treatment strategies such as catheter ablation. This study emphasizes the importance of personalized risk assessment in guiding therapeutic decisions, minimizing unnecessary interventions, and improving outcomes. This review's novel contribution lies in its updated analysis of risk stratification models, which incorporates new research on the genetic and epidemiological factors influencing WPW syndrome. This analysis emphasizes the evolving role of catheter ablation as a first-line treatment for high-risk patients, demonstrating its potential to provide long-term arrhythmia control with minimal complications. Our findings underscore the necessity for ongoing post-ablation surveillance to monitor for recurrence and to optimize patient care, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.