ArticleSystematic biology2026
CAnDI: A New Tool to Investigate Conflict in Homologous Gene Trees and Explain Convergent Trait Evolution.
Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phenotypic convergence is found across the tree of life, and morphological similarities in distantly related species are often presumed to have evolved independently. However, clarifying the origins of traits has recently highlighted the complex nature of evolution, as apparent convergent features often share similar genetic foundations. Hence, the tree topology of genes that underlie such traits frequently conflicts with the overall history of species relationships. This conflict, which usually results from incomplete lineage sorting, introgression, or horizontal gene transfer, creates both a challenge for systematists and an exciting opportunity to investigate the rich, complex network of information that connects molecular trajectories with trait evolution. Here, we present a novel conflict identification program named CAnDI (Conflict And Duplication Identifier), which enables the analysis of conflict in homologous gene trees rather than inferred orthologs. We demonstrate that the analysis of conflicts in homologous trees using CAnDI yields more comparisons than in ortholog trees in six datasets from across the eukaryotic tree of life. Using the carnivorous trap of Caryophyllales, a charismatic group of flowering plants, as a case study we demonstrate that analyzing conflict on entire homolog trees can aid in inferring the contribution of standing genetic variation to trait evolution: by dissecting all gene relationships within homolog trees, we find genomic evidence that the molecular basis of the pleisiomorphic mucilaginous sticky trap was likely present in the ancestor of all carnivorous Caryophyllales. We also show that many genes whose evolutionary trajectories group species with similar trap devices code for proteins contributing to plant carnivory and identify a LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARY DOMAIN transcription factor as a possible candidate for regulating sticky trap development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.