ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Advancing herbal medicine safety: the need for a global pharmacovigilance approach.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Levodopa and Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Parkinson's Disease: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Future Perspectives.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Phytochemical Composition of Clonally PropagatedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Shared inflammatory architecture and therapeutic tensions between psoriasis and Crohn's disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The phytochemistry and pharmacological activities ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- The safety of herbal medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): current landscape and promoting the pharmacovigilance practices.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Evidence-based production framework for herbal medicine regulation in Indonesia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Navigating the regulatory landscape of herbal medicines: A global comparison of India, China, Europe, the United States and Japan.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herbal and traditional medicines (H&TMs) form a significant part of healthcare practices worldwide, often perceived as safe alternatives to conventional treatments. However, this perception has led to challenges in ensuring the safety and efficacy of these products, highlighting the critical importance of pharmacovigilance for herbal medicines. Over the past two decades, concerted efforts have been made globally to establish robust regulatory frameworks, leading to the emergence of phytovigilance systems. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pharmacovigilance mechanisms in various countries, emphasizing recent developments, persistent challenges, and international perspectives in the field. The study underscores the need for systematic monitoring of adverse events (AEs) associated with herbal medicines to safeguard patient health. A key focus is placed on comparing the processes and mechanisms employed by different nations in building up safety monitoring systems, identifying gaps in knowledge and practices, and evaluating stakeholder awareness and involvement. The findings highlight the necessity of harmonizing global regulations under the guidance of the World Health Organization (WHO) to ensure uniformity and efficacy in reporting systems. This article advocates for a collaborative international approach, inclusive of all regulatory agencies, to enhance the safety of herbal therapies. By proposing comprehensive, standardized guidelines, it aims to bridge existing gaps and strengthen the pharmacovigilance infrastructure for herbal medicines globally, paving the way for improved patient safety and trust in traditional medical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40338319What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.