Evidence mapPaperPMID 40338356Full record

SynthesisJournal of global health2025

Medication adherence trajectories and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qiaoling Hou, Yuhan Zhao, Ying Wu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Developmental trajectories of medication adherence and predictors of latent classes in patients with ischemic stroke].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiaoling HouSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuhan ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ying WuSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The role of medication adherence trajectories in the clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remains unclear. We aimed to analyse the impact of different medication adherence trajectories on mortality and other key clinical outcomes in patients with CVDs. Methods: We identified longitudinal cohort studies that reported the association between medication adherence trajectories and clinical outcomes in patients with CVDs by conducting a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, without applying language restrictions in August 2024. We pooled the published hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using random effects models and assessed potential bias through Egger regression analysis. Results: In this meta-analysis, we included nine cohorts with 226 203 patients with a mean age of 66.1 years and a maximum follow-up of five years. Eight of the nine studies used the proportion of days covered to assess medication adherence. We identified four distinct medication adherence trajectories: persistent adherence, persistent nonadherence, gradually increasing adherence, and gradually declining adherence. Compared to persistent adherence, persistent nonadherence was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and recurrent venous thromboembolism, with risk increases ranging from 32% to nearly three times higher. Gradually increasing adherence was associated with a 26% higher risk of mortality and a 22% increased risk of MACE. In the group with gradually declining adherence, the risk of MACE increased by 24%, while the risk of major bleeding decreased by 43%. The overall risk of bias was low. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the consistency and robustness of these findings. Conclusions: This study underscores the substantial benefits of maintaining persistent adherence to prescribed medication regimens for patients with CVDs. Conversely, persistent nonadherence significantly elevates the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023456395.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMedication AdherenceAgedHumans

Identifiers

PMID40338356
PMCPMC12061002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.