ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Predicting fixations and gaze location from EEG.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GACNet: A graph attention-based neural network for electroencephalography localization via contrastive learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain signals carry cognitive information that can be relevant in downstream tasks, but what about eye-gaze? Although this can be estimated with eye-trackers, it can be very convenient in practice to do it without extra equipment. We consider the challenging tasks of fixation prediction and gaze estimation from electroencephalography (EEG) using deep learning models. We argue that there are three critical design criteria when designing neural architectures for EEG: (1) the spatial and temporal dimensions of the data, (2) the local vs global nature of the data processing, and (3) the overall structure and order with which the steps (1) and (2) are orchestrated. We propose two model architectures, based on Transformers and LSTMs, with different variants in this large design space, and compare them with recent state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches under two constraints: reduced EEG signal length and reduced set of EEG channels. Our Transformer-based model outperforms the LSTM-only model, but it turns out to be more sensitive with short signal lengths and with less number of channels. Interestingly, our results are similar or slightly better than SOTA, and the models are trained from scratch (i.e., without pre-training or fine-tuning). Our findings provide useful insights for advancing in eye-from-EEG tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.