ArticlePloS one2025
Deep learning based semantic segmentation of leukemia effected white blood cell.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sequential boundary tracking via reinforcement learning for overlapping cell resolution in sickle cell imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical image segmentation has numerous applications in diagnosing different diseases. Various types of diseases are found in white blood and Red blood cells. This paper represents the segmentation of WBCs from blood smear images. It is a complex and challenging task due to the frequent overlapping and variants in size and shape of WBCs with each other and RBCs. This overlapping is due to the rough border of the immature cells. The paper describes a new approach to WBC segmentation using UNet++, the marker watershed algorithm, and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE). This technique uses UNet++ for pre-segmentation, followed by the marker watershed method, which has been integrated using ODE to deepen the segmentation process. This novel integration enhances clinical applications in automated blood cell analysis, diagnostic imaging, and disease monitoring, improving accuracy and robustness. The ODE is used after the convolution operation to reduce the error at each step, preventing the massive propagation of error in the forward and the backpropagation. The White blood cells are segmented from the input smear images using ALL_IDB1 and ALL_IDB2 datasets, which are further used in the experiment section. UNet ++ is used to generate the pre-segmented probabilistic grayscale images. Some white blood cells are connected and make groups appearing in the grayscale images. These groups of WBCs are separated using a technique called the marker watershed, which gives us the final segmented result. The experimentation results show that the mean intersection over union (Jaccard method), the Dice similarity coefficient, and the mean pixel accuracy are 97.73%, 98.36%, and 98.97%, respectively. The structure and size of the white blood cells vary from red blood cells and platelets, which makes this work different from others. Furthermore, the combination of UNet++, marker watershed, and Neural Ordinary Differential Equation makes the proposed system unique from existing systems. This work can be further investigated to reduce computational complexity and memory space for optimizing deployment on low-resource devices, such as smart healthcare systems. Techniques like model pruning, quantization, or learned information distillation might be explored to create a lightweight version of the model without much loss in accuracy. Such developments would make possible mass uses of automated white blood cell segmentation in portable, low-cost health devices for point-of-care remote diagnostics and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.