Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40339600›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2025

Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery : Its Roles and Limitations.

Yong Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Feasibility and accuracy of AI-assisted 3D MRI/CT fusion imaging for preoperative simulation of full-endoscopic transforaminal discectomy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yong AhnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic spine surgery is the perfect culmination of the concept of minimally invasive spine surgery. Among the various endoscopic spine procedures, full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) is an endoscopic technique characterized by the performance of the entire spinal procedure via the percutaneous approach using a uniportal working-channel endoscope with continuous saline perfusion. FESS effectively decompresses the tissues and allows for instrumentation while preserving the normal musculoskeletal structures. It also has fewer complications and enables quicker return to work. However, potential disadvantages include its steep learning curves and limited indications. Previously, the indications for endoscopic procedures had been limited to soft disc herniations or focal neural impingement, with most degenerative spinal diseases other than disc herniation being considered contraindications. However, owing to the remarkable advancements in endoscopic technology, nearly all degenerative spinal diseases, including spinal stenosis and instability, can currently be treated using FESS. Furthermore, the application of spinal endoscopes has expanded to other spinal disorders, including infections, traumas, and tumors. Unfortunately, the steep learning curve and technical limitations of FESS cannot be overlooked by most standard spine surgeons. To ensure the clinical success of endoscopic procedures in actual clinical practice, a comprehensive understanding of the core properties of working channel endoscopes is necessary to facilitate the learning process. With the ongoing development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic surgery can be expected to become the standard treatment approach for all degenerative spinal diseases in the near future.

Indexed as

EndoscopyForaminotomyHerniated discLaminectomySpinal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID40339600
PMCPMC12415494

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.