Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40339746›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Genomic insights into the population history of fat-tailed sheep and identification of two mutations that contribute to fat tail adipogenesis.

Meilin Jin, Gang Liu, Enmin Liu, Lizhong Wang, Yu Jiang, Zhuqing Zheng, Jian Lu, Zengkui Lu, Youji Ma, Yongbin Liu and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Meilin JinInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Gang LiuNational Center of Preservation & Utilization of Animal Genetic Resources, National Animal Husbandry Service, Beijing 100125, China.
Enmin LiuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Lizhong WangBGI-Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Yu JiangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Zhuqing ZhengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Jian LuNational Center of Preservation & Utilization of Animal Genetic Resources, National Animal Husbandry Service, Beijing 100125, China.
Zengkui LuLanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730050, China.
Youji MaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Yongbin LiuInner Mongolia Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Kai QuanCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Hai JinInner Mongolia Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Xunping JiangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xiaojuan FeiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Taotao LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Jiaxue CaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Zehu YuanCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Lixin DuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: lxdu@263.net.
Huihua WangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: wanghuihua@caas.cn.
Caihong WeiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: weicaihong@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince their domestication, domestic sheep (Ovis aries) have been culturally and economically significant farming animals worldwide. Fat-tailed sheep serve as a unique genetic resource for understanding adipogenesis and adaptive evolution in livestock.

objectivesSeveral genomic analyses have been conducted on various sheep breeds to elucidate the genome and regulation mechanism of the fat tail trait, prior genomic studies have failed to reconcile conflicting evidence about the genetic basis of tail morphology, particularly regarding the roles of PDGFD and BMP2.

methodsHere, we conducted whole-genome resequencing of 283 sheep, encompassing 66 domestic breeds and 5 wild ovine species, to investigate the domestication history and selection signatures of fat-tailed sheep. Additionally, we performed transcriptome sequencing on adipose tissue to identify differentially expressed genes and cellular assays to validate these results.

resultsDemographic analysis revealed that domestic sheep descended from Asiatic mouflon and fat-tailed sheep began to diverge from thin-tailed sheep approximately 4.4-7.5 thousand years ago in East Asia. Chinese indigenous sheep were classified into Mongolian, Kazakh, Tibetan, and Yunnan populations. The Yunnan population may have experienced more recent genetic introgression from wild species, rather than an independent domestication event. Moreover, many potential regions associated with the fat-tailed phenotype (DDI1, PDGFD, and BMP2) were identified by selective sweep and genome-wide association analyses. Additionally, a fine-scale analysis of fat-tailed and thin-tailed sheep revealed two novel mutations: a G/A missense variant of PDGFD (Chr15: 3900312) and a C/T missense variant of BMP2 (Chr13: 48462350), both of which were significantly associated with tail adiposity. Functional validation demonstrated that mutant A-PDGFD significantly activated PFGFD expression and reduced fat deposition compared to wildtype. The C-BMP2 mutant activated BMP2 expression and promoted preadipocyte fat deposition.

conclusionOur study provides the first evidence that these genes jointly regulate fat tail development through complementary mechanisms: PDGFD promotes adipose expansion, whereas BMP2 modulates energy partitioning. These findings offer new insights into the evolutionary history of fat-tailed sheep and identify potential targets for precision breeding in small ruminants.

Indexed as

AdipogenesisMutationSheep, DomesticTailAdipose TissueAnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2GenomicsPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSheepBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Platelet-Derived Growth FactorFat-tailed sheep adipogenesis regulation mechanismFat-tailed sheep migration routeFat-tailed traits selection adaptationPopulation structureWhole-genome resequencing

Identifiers

PMID40339746
PMCPMC12869290

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.