Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40340097›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2025

New dimensions in the molecular genetics of insect chemoreception.

Gaëlle J S Talross, John R Carlson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gaëlle J S TalrossDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: gaelle.talhouarne@yale.edu.
John R CarlsonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: john.carlson@yale.edu.

Funding

ANALYSIS OF ODORANT RECEPTOR GENESR01DC004729 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John R Carlson · 2001 to 2026
$9.2M
GENETIC AND MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF OLFACTIONR01DC002174 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARLSON, JOHN R · 1994 to 2024
$8.0M
Analysis of a large family of taste receptorsR01DC011697 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John R Carlson · 2011 to 2026
$5.5M
A new dimension to the olfactory system: long non-coding (lnc)RNAs and a lncRNA-encoded micropeptideK99DC021743 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TALROSS, GAËLLE J.S. · 2024 to 2025
$245k
NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC021743NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002174NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004729NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoreception is the foundation of olfaction and taste, which in insects underlie the detection of humans to whom they spread disease and crops that they ravage. Recent advances have provided clear and in some cases surprising new insights into the molecular genetics of chemoreception. We describe mechanisms that govern the choice of a single Odorant receptor gene by an olfactory receptor neuron in Drosophila. We highlight genetic and epigenetic mechanisms by which chemoreceptor expression can be modulated. Exitrons, RNA editing, and pseudo-pseudogenes in chemosensory systems are described. We summarize key insights from the recent structural determinations of odorant and taste receptors. Finally, new molecular components of chemosensory systems, including long noncoding RNAs, are described.

Indexed as

InsectaReceptors, OdorantAnimalsChemoreceptor CellsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEpigenesis, GeneticOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSmellTasteDrosophila ProteinsReceptors, OdorantchemoreceptorDrosophilagustationinsectolfactiontaste

Identifiers

PMID40340097
PMCPMC12324945

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.