ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Data-Driven Virtual Screening of Conformational Ensembles of Transition-Metal Complexes.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transition-metal complexes serve as highly enantioselective homogeneous catalysts for various transformations, making them valuable in the pharmaceutical industry. Data-driven prediction models can accelerate high-throughput catalyst design but require computer-readable representations that account for conformational flexibility. This is typically achieved through high-level conformer searches, followed by DFT optimization of the transition-metal complexes. However, conformer selection remains reliant on human assumptions, with no cost-efficient and generalizable workflow available. To address this, we introduce an automated approach to correlate CREST(GFN2-xTB//GFN-FF)-generated conformer ensembles with their DFT-optimized counterparts for systematic conformer selection. We analyzed 24 precatalyst structures, performing CREST conformer searches, followed by full DFT optimization. Three filtering methods were evaluated: (i) geometric ligand descriptors, (ii) PCA-based selection, and (iii) DBSCAN clustering using RMSD and energy. The proposed methods were validated on Rh-based catalysts featuring bisphosphine ligands, which are widely employed in hydrogenation reactions. To assess general applicability, both the precatalyst and its corresponding acrylate-bound complex were analyzed. Our results confirm that CREST overestimates ligand flexibility, and energy-based filtering is ineffective. PCA-based selection failed to distinguish conformers by DFT energy, while RMSD-based filtering improved selection but lacked tunability. DBSCAN clustering provided the most effective approach, eliminating redundancies while preserving key configurations. This method remained robust across data sets and is computationally efficient without requiring molecular descriptor calculations. These findings highlight the limitations of energy-based filtering and the advantages of structure-based approaches for conformer selection. While DBSCAN clustering is a practical solution, its parameters remain system-dependent. For high-accuracy applications, refined energy calculations may be necessary; however, DBSCAN-based clustering offers a computationally accessible strategy for rapid catalyst representations involving conformational flexibility.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.