Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40340549›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Predicting Mesothelioma Using Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review of Common Models and Applications.

Malihe Ram, Mohammad Reza Afrash, Khadijeh Moulaei, Erfan Esmaeeli, Mohadeseh Sadat Khorashadizadeh, Ali Garavand, Parastoo Amiri, Azam Sabahi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Malihe RamFaculty of Medical Sciences, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Mohammad Reza AfrashArtificial Intelligence in Medical Sciences Research Center, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Khadijeh MoulaeiHealth Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Erfan EsmaeeliDepartment of Health Information Management and Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0004-8229-5232
Mohadeseh Sadat KhorashadizadehDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali GaravandDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Parastoo AmiriDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Azam SabahiDepartment of Health Information Technology, Ferdows Faculty of Medical Sciences, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionMesothelioma is a type of lung cancer caused by asbestos exposure, and early diagnosis is crucial for improving survival chances. Artificial intelligence offers a potential solution for the timely diagnosis and staging of the disease. This study aims to review the latest research conducted in artificial intelligence applications to predict mesothelioma.MethodsUntil April 24, 2023, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched comprehensively for articles on artificial intelligence in mesothelioma management. The data was gathered using a standardized extraction form, and the findings were reported in figures and tables.ResultsOne hundred and seventy-three articles were identified from database searches, which were then reduced to 151 after eliminating duplicates. Finally, 19 articles were selected for inclusion in our study. The applications of artificial intelligence in these articles primarily focused on tumor diagnosis and classification (73.69%), followed by prevention and prognosis (21.05%) and tumor volumetric measurement of malignant pleural mesothelioma (5.26%). The most frequently used AI models include types of neural networks (NN), decision trees (DT), random forests (RF), logistic regression (LogR), Naïve Bayes (NB), and support vector machines (SVM). SVM, DT, and RF emerged as prominent models, achieving high accuracies ranging from 78.3% to 99.97%. Genetic algorithms, correlation-based algorithms, and Neural Networks were employed for risk factor identification and feature selection.ConclusionArtificial intelligence, particularly machine learning models such as neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and random forests, holds promise in predicting and managing mesothelioma, potentially enhancing early detection and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantBayes TheoremHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisartificial intelligencelogistic regressionlung neoplasmsmachine learningmesotheliomasupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID40340549
PMCPMC12065984

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.