ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Predicting peripartum depression using elastic net regression and machine learning: the role of remnant cholesterol.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditional statistical methods have dominated research on peripartum depression (PPD), but innovative approaches may provide deeper insights. This study aims to predict the impact factors of PPD using elastic net regression (ENR) combined with machine learning (ML) model.
methodsThis longitudinal study was conducted from June 2020 to May 2023, involving healthy pregnant women in the first trimester, followed up until the completion of the assessment in the second trimester. PPD symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Features with p <.05 from logistic regression were selected and refined using ENR. These features were then used to build six ML models to identify the best-performing one. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to enhance model interpretability by visualizing its decision-making process.
resultsA total of 608 participants were followed, resulting in 384 valid questionnaires. After excluding incomplete or incorrect baseline data, 325 participants were ultimately included in the study. Among these, 130 were classified as having mild depression, and 32 were classified with major depression. Nineteen features were initially identified as being associated with PPD, with 14 retained after ENR refinement. The random forest (RF) model outperformed the other ML models. SHAP analysis identified the top five predictors of PPD: magnesium (Mg), remnant cholesterol (RC), calcium (Ca), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHc), and potassium (K). Mg, Ca, MCHc, and K were negatively correlated with PPD, while RC showed a positive correlation.
conclusionsThe RF model effectively identified associations between exposure factors and PPD. Mg, Ca, MCHc, and K were found to be protective factors, while RC emerged as a potential risk factor, highlighting its potential as a novel biomarker for PPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.