ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Machine learning-based survival models for predicting rehospitalization of older hip fracture patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction After Osteoporotic Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prediction Model Performance.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of short- and long-term mortality prediction in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery using a biomarker-based interpretable predictive modeling approach: a retrospective cohort analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Restoration's Longevity in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Machine Learning Survival Analysis From Randomised Clinical Trials.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
- Correction: Machine learning-based survival models for predicting rehospitalization of older hip fracture patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate machine learning-based survival model roles in predicting rehospitalization after hip fractures to improve reduce the burden on the healthcare system.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study examined 718 patients with hip fractures hospitalized at the Daejeon Eulji Medical Center between January 2020 and June 2022. Demographic and clinical variables, and rehospitalization data were collected at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH), random survival forest (RSF), gradient boosting (GB), and fast survival support vector machine (SVM) models were developed. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (c-index), area under the curve (AUC), and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Feature importance was analyzed using permutation importance, with the best model selected based on overall performance.
resultsHyperparameter tuning optimized the models. The GB model had the highest mean AUC of 0.868, followed by the RSF (0.785), SVM (0.763), and CoxPH (0.736) models. Feature importance analysis highlighted femoral neck T-score, age, body mass index, operation time, compression fracture, and total calcium as significant predictors. Feature selection improved the c-index for the RSF model from 0.742 to 0.874 and CoxPH model from 0.717 to 0.915; the GB and SVM models exhibited a c-index decline post-feature selection. The GB and RSF models predicted lower rehospitalization probabilities than Kaplan-Meier estimates; the CoxPH model's predictions were closely aligned with the observed data.
conclusionsThe effect of feature selection on model performance highlights the need for comprehensive variable selection and model evaluation strategies to improve predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.