ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2025
Evaluation of early-phase
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Italian intersocietal recommendations for restructuring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the implementation and appropriate use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Correlation and Interchangeability of Amyloid, Tau, and Glucose Metabolism PET in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer: A Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Baseline Findings from Dual-Phase Amyloid PET Study in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis: Exploring Its Potential as a Biomarker of Myelination and Neurodegeneration.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the spatial covariance of cerebral vascular density and amyloid burden in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundImaging biomarkers are essential in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, particularly since the introduction of the ATN criteria by the NIA-AA. These criteria include amyloid-β plaques (amyloid PET), fibrillar tau (tau PET), and neurodegeneration (FDG PET or MRI). Early-phase amyloid PET imaging has shown a strong correlation with FDG PET at the group level.ObjectiveThis study evaluates the comparability of early-phase FBB PET (eFBB) perfusion imaging and FDG PET metabolic imaging at both group and individual levels.MethodsA retrospective study included 103 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia suspected of AD who underwent FDG PET and dual-phase
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.