Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40340939›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025

Liquid biopsy in gynecological cancers: a translational framework from molecular insights to precision oncology and clinical practice.

Canio Martinelli, Alfredo Ercoli, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Sharon Raffaella Burk, Maria Cuomo, Vrunda Satasiya, Housem Kacem, Simone Braccia, Giulio Mazzarotti, Irene Miriello and 14 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Canio MartinelliSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Alfredo ErcoliDepartment of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, Messina, 98124, Italy.
Giuseppe VizzielliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Sharon Raffaella BurkSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Maria CuomoSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Vrunda SatasiyaSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Housem KacemSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Simone BracciaSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Giulio MazzarottiSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Irene MirielloSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Manuela Nana TchamouSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Stefano RestainoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Martina ArcieriClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Alice PoliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Veronica TiusClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Silvana ParisiRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, 98125, Italy.
Stefano PergolizziRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, 98125, Italy.
Giuseppe IatìRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, 98125, Italy.
Chiara Conti NibaliDepartment of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, Messina, 98124, Italy.
Cristina PizzimentiSection of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age "Gaetano Barresi", G. Martino Hospital, Messina, 98125, Italy.
Ludovica PepeSection of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age "Gaetano Barresi", G. Martino Hospital, Messina, 98125, Italy.
Antonio IeniSection of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age "Gaetano Barresi", G. Martino Hospital, Messina, 98125, Italy.
Salvatore CortellinoClinical and Translational Oncology, Scuola Superiore Meridionale (SSM), Naples, Italy. s.cortellino@ssmeridionale.it.
Antonio GiordanoSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 N 12 St, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. giordano@temple.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy offers a noninvasive method to identify and monitor tumor-derived biomarkers, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosomes, microRNAs, and tumor-educated platelets, that provide real-time insights into the biological behavior of gynecological cancers. The detection of these markers has the potential to revolutionize cancer management by enabling earlier detection, providing novel data to personalize treatments, and predicting disease recurrence before clinical imaging and predicting disease recurrence before clinical imaging can confirm progression, thereby also guiding complex clinical decision-making. However, because this new "omics" layer introduces additional complexity, it must be fully understood, from its biological rationale to technical development and clinical integration, to prevent confusion or misapplication. That is why, focusing on 14 critical fields of inquiry, our goal is to map the current state of liquid biopsy from bench to bedside while highlighting practical considerations for clinical integration. Each topic integrates recent advances in assay sensitivity, biomarker variability, and data interpretation, underscoring how standardized protocols and robust analytical methods are pivotal for reliable results. We then translate these findings into disease-specific insights, examining how liquid biopsy could refine early detection, minimal residual disease assessment, and therapy guidance in endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers. Although several FDA-approved assays and promising commercial tests illustrate the field's rapid evolution, many translational hurdles remain, including the need for harmonized protocols, larger prospective clinical trials, and cost-effectiveness analyses. Crucially, our synthesis clarifies the pivotal role of interdisciplinary collaboration. Oncologists, laboratory scientists, and industry partners must align on standardized procedures and clinically relevant endpoints. Without such coordination, promising biomarkers may remain confined to research settings, limiting their practical benefit. Taken together, our review offers a translational view designed to contextualize liquid biopsy in gynecological oncology.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGenital Neoplasms, FemalePrecision MedicineFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingTranslational Research, BiomedicalBiomarkers, TumorClinical implementationGynecological cancerLiquid biopsyNarrative reviewPrecision oncologyTranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID40340939
PMCPMC12060497

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.