ArticleJournal of global health2025
Optimising participation in a pulmonary rehabilitation programme for people living with chronic respiratory diseases in rural India: a feasibility study.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Feasibility and Acceptability of Culturally Appropriate Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Sri Lanka: Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Trial
- Pulmonary rehabilitation for pulmonary hypertension in high-altitude areas: a mixed-methods study of medical staff's perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) plays a vital role in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). However, implementation of this multidisciplinary approach in resource-poor settings may not be sufficient because of referrers' uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of PR, inconvenient timing, travel issues, patients' lack of motivation, and poor family support. The aim was to test the feasibility of a peer-led, professionally assisted community-based PR programme for CRD patients in a rural, low literacy setting. Methods: We conducted a single-centre, pre-post feasibility study. Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of CRD were recruited and treatment was optimised. After completing baseline assessments, the participants underwent eight weeks of PR training (16 sessions) in six groups at five local facilities led by peers selected by the participants and assisted by professionals. Exercise capacity was assessed with 6-Minute Walk Test. Other outcomes were: International Physical Activity Questionnaire; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale. Upper and lower limb strength were assessed using a handheld dynamometer and cycle ergometer, respectively. Descriptive analysis was performed, and pre-and post-outcomes were compared using parametric tests. Results: Thirty participants (20 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 10 asthma; 15 female; median age 57.5 years) completed baseline and endline assessments. Seventy percent completed at least 12/16 sessions. After eight weeks of training, the 6-Minute Walk Test had improved from 263.3 (standard deviation (SD) = 72.3) to 319.6 (SD = 84.7) metres (P < 0.001) with significant improvement in modified Medical Research Council (P = 0.022), London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (P < 0.001) and dominant handgrip strength (P < 0.001) but no significant change in physical activity (P = 0.791). Conclusions: The community-based PR led by peer volunteers and supported by professionals proved to be feasible in our low-resource setting and was associated with improved exercise tolerance and other outcomes. Registration: The study was registered at the Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI/2020/09/027818).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.