Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341043›Full record

Observational studyRadiation oncology (London, England)2025

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer: results from a retrospective study using extended CROSS regimen.

Tobias Haltmeier, Jennifer Brazerol, Yves Borbely, Elena Riggenbach, Anna Stenger-Weisser, Burim Sermaxhaj, Martin D Berger, Hossein Hemmatazad

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tobias HaltmeierDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jennifer BrazerolDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yves BorbelyDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Elena RiggenbachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anna Stenger-WeisserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Burim SermaxhajDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin D BergerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hossein HemmatazadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. hossein.hemmatazad@insel.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer includes perioperative chemotherapy or neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT), followed by surgery. At our institution, a modified neo-adjuvant regimen combining elements from CROSS and CALGB 9781 trials was adopted. This study aimed to assess the impact of our modified regimen on oncological outcomes, toxicity profile and pathological complete response rates compared to the CROSS trial.

methodsThis observational study included patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neo-adjuvant CRT followed by tumor resection at a tertiary care university hospital between 2014 and 2018. The modified radiation therapy consisted of 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy (50.4 Gy in total) with weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel. We assessed mortality over time using the median survival time. The impact of pathological complete response and radiation intensity on mortality was assessed in multivariable Cox regression analysis, adjusting for clinically relevant variables, including sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system score, tumor and nodal stage, and the histological tumor type.

resultsA total of 46 patients were included. Median age was 67 years (IQR 9), 36 patients (78.3%) were male. An ASA score ≥ 3 was reported in 90.7% of the patients. Among the patients, 38 (82.6%) had a clinical tumor stage (cT) of ≥ 3, and 42 (91.3%) showed a positive endo-sonographic nodal stage (uN+). Pathological complete response was found in 7/42 patients (16.7%). Median survival time was 2.7 years (95% CI 1.340-4.084). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, pathological complete response was associated with significantly lower mortality over time (OR 0.152, 95%CI 0.049-0.989, p = 0.048). For larger radiation volumes, a trend towards increased mortality was shown, although not statistically significant (radiation volume/100: OR 1.172, 95%CI 0.987-1.392).

conclusionsIn patients with esophageal cancer undergoing trimodal therapy, the radiation dose escalation to 50.4 Gy was not associated with higher rates of pathological complete response or a survival benefit compared to the results of the CROSS trial. However, multivariable analysis revealed a trend toward increased mortality with larger radiation volumes. Based on these results, using modern radiotherapy techniques such as online adaptive radiotherapy might be more beneficial instead of escalating the radiation dose.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionNeoadjuvant TherapyStomach NeoplasmsAgedCarboplatinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateCarboplatinPaclitaxelChemo-radiotherapyEsophageal cancerEsophagectomyNeo-adjuvant treatmentPathologic complete responseSurvival

Identifiers

PMID40341043
PMCPMC12063444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.