Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341190›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2025

Designing Personalized Multimodal Mnemonics With AI: A Medical Student's Implementation Tutorial.

Noor Elabd, Zafirah Muhammad Rahman, Salma Ibrahim Abu Alinnin, Samiyah Jahan, Luciana Aparecida Campos, Ovidiu Constantin Baltatu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noor Elabd *College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, PO Box 50927, Riyadh, 11533, Saudi Arabia, 966 554809089.ORCID 0009-0007-9830-7826
Zafirah Muhammad Rahman *College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, PO Box 50927, Riyadh, 11533, Saudi Arabia, 966 554809089.ORCID 0009-0001-1255-4401
Salma Ibrahim Abu AlinninCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, PO Box 50927, Riyadh, 11533, Saudi Arabia, 966 554809089.ORCID 0009-0008-7763-1288
Samiyah JahanCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, PO Box 50927, Riyadh, 11533, Saudi Arabia, 966 554809089.ORCID 0009-0003-5496-7102
Luciana Aparecida CamposCenter of Innovation, Technology, and Education, Anhembi Morumbi University, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8162-1022
Ovidiu Constantin BaltatuCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, PO Box 50927, Riyadh, 11533, Saudi Arabia, 966 554809089.ORCID 0000-0001-9732-6039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical education can be challenging for students as they must manage vast amounts of complex information. Traditional mnemonic resources often follow a standardized approach, which may not accommodate diverse learning styles. Objective: This tutorial presents a student-developed approach to creating personalized multimodal mnemonics (PMMs) using artifical intelligence tools. Methods: This tutorial demonstrates a structured implementation process using ChatGPT (GPT-4 model) for text mnemonic generation and DALL-E 3 for visual mnemonic creation. We detail the prompt engineering framework, including zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting techniques. The process involves (1) template development, (2) refinement, (3) personalization, (4) mnemonic specification, and (5) quality control. The implementation time typically ranges from 2 to 5 minutes per concept, with 1 to 3 iterations needed for optimal results. Results: Through systematic testing across 6 medical concepts, the implementation process achieved an initial success rate of 85%, improving to 95% after refinement. Key challenges included maintaining medical accuracy (addressed through specific terminology in prompts), ensuring visual clarity (improved through anatomical detail specifications), and achieving integration of text and visuals (resolved through structured review protocols). This tutorial provides practical templates, troubleshooting strategies, and quality control measures to address common implementation challenges. Conclusions: This tutorial offers medical students a practical framework for creating personalized learning tools using artificial intelligence. By following the detailed prompt engineering process and quality control measures, students can efficiently generate customized mnemonics while avoiding common pitfalls. The approach emphasizes human oversight and iterative refinement to ensure medical accuracy and educational value. The elimination of the need for developing separate databases of mnemonics streamlines the learning process.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalHumansAIChatGPTdigital literacydual-coding theoryhealth care professionallarge language modelmachine learningmedical educationmedical studentmemory techniquesmultimodal learningnatural language processingNLPpersonalized learningprompt engineeringstudent-centeredstudent-centered approach

Identifiers

PMID40341190
PMCPMC12080963

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.