ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of the functional outcome of intensive inpatient rehabilitation after stroke using machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Post Stroke Intensive Rehabilitation: Predictors of Outcome and Response to Specific Interventions
STroke RehabilitATion rEgistrY for Predicting Functional Outcomes
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Microglia-derived Extracellular Vesicles Predict Recovery After Rehabilitation in Stroke Survivors.Translational stroke research · 2026Trial
- Association of emergency department stroke care processes with rehabilitation outcomes after first-ever stroke.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Ten Recommendations for Improving Research on Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Unified Perspective.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2026Review
- Article
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Post-Stroke Functional Recovery Based on Clinical and Nursing Factors.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and internal validation of an artificial intelligence-driven precision rehabilitation model for ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning approaches to racial/ethnic differences in social determinants of mild cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia in the All of Us Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
- The Glymphatic-Venous Axis in Brain Clearance Failure: Aquaporin-4 Dysfunction, Biomarker Imaging, and Precision Therapeutic Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prediction of acupuncture efficacy in acute ischemic stroke constructing a clinical-radiomics multimodal model.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the left DLPFC on cognitive function and inflammatory markers in post-stroke cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An accurate and reliable functional prognosis is vital to stroke patients addressing rehabilitation, to their families, and healthcare providers. This study aimed at developing and validating externally patient-wise prognostic models of the global functional outcome at discharge from intensive inpatient post-acute rehabilitation after stroke, based on a standardized comprehensive multidimensional assessment performed at admission to rehabilitation. Patients addressing intensive inpatient rehabilitation pathways within 30 days from stroke were prospectively enrolled in two consecutive multisite studies. Demographics, description of the event, clinical/functional, and psycho-social data were collected. The outcome of interest was disability in basic daily living activities at discharge, measured by the modified Barthel Index (mBI). Machine learning-based prognostic models were developed, internally cross-validated, and externally validated. Interpretability techniques were applied for the analysis of predictors. 385 patients were considered, 220 (165) for training (external test) sets. A 50.9% (55.8%) of women, 79.5% (80.0%) of ischemic, and a median [interquartile range- IQR] age of 80.0[15.0] (79.0[17.0]) were registered. The Support Vector Machine obtained the best validation performances and a median absolute error [IQR] on discharge mBI estimation of 11.5[15.0] and 9.2[13.0] points on the internal and external testing, respectively. The baseline variables providing the main contributions to the predictions were mBI, motor upper-limb score, age, and cognitive screening score. We achieved a solution to support the formulation of a functional prognosis at intensive rehabilitation admission. The interpretability analysis confirms the relevance of easily collected motor and cognitive dataat admission and of the patient's age.Trial registration: Prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (registration numbers RIPS NCT03866057, STRATEGY NCT05389878).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.