Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341555›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2025

Four guidelines to identify bona fide protease-substrate pairs.

Shuning Qi, Shamik Mazumdar, Yong Zou, Qun Yang, Simon Stael, Maxence James

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuning QiDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0006-6470-5802
Shamik MazumdarDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7319-1069
Yong ZouDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-2243
Qun YangDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-6321
Simon StaelDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8322-0428
Maxence JamesDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-6638

Funding

DETOXPEST' 101044878European Research Council Consolidator Grant 2021Knut and Alice Wallenberg F0coundation 2021.0071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant proteases are an important class of enzymes, with proposed involvement in various aspects of the plant life cycle. However, pinpointing authentic protease-substrate interactions remains challenging, which hinders a comprehensive understanding of the biological function of proteases. Moreover, a structured set of guidelines to validate protease substrates is lacking. In this review, we outline a minimum of four key guidelines that, when followed, can confirm the specificity of protease-substrate interaction for proteases that perform limited proteolysis and with specific cleavage sites: (i) the observation of substrate cleavage; (ii) the reduction in substrate cleavage due to protease inhibitors or (iii) genetic mutation of the protease; and (iv) a final proof of the specificity of the substrate cleavage site. It is important to emphasize that these guidelines are not universally applicable to all proteases. By creating a set of guidelines, summarizing current findings and proposing future research directions, this review aims to highlight innovative techniques that will improve the specificity and accuracy of protease research and facilitate a deeper understanding of the role of proteases in plant biology.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicPeptide HydrolasesPlant ProteinsPlantsProteolysisSubstrate SpecificityPeptide HydrolasesPlant ProteinsActivity-based protein profiling probe (ABPP)N-terminomicsplant proteasesprotease inhibitorsprotease substratesproteolysissubstrate cleavage site

Identifiers

PMID40341555
PMCPMC12485226

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.