ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025
Glucocorticoids discontinuation in systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre study.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: Glucocorticoid discontinuation in systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre study. Reply.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Article
- Comment on: Glucocorticoid discontinuation in systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre study.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the relapse rate of SLE patients after glucocorticoids (GCs) withdrawn, assess the risk factors associated with disease relapse and clarify the outcome of patients with relapse. Methods: Data of SLE patients who discontinued GC during 2017-2022 were included. Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio for different factors contributing to lupus relapse. Kaplan-Meier model was used to assess the cumulative relapse rate. For those who relapsed, the proportion of patients regaining remission or lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) was tracked, and factors associated with remission were analysed. Results: Totally 217 SLE patients were included, of whom 166 experienced disease relapse. The non-relapse rates were 57.3% at 1 year, 19.6% at 3 years and only 7.8% at 5 years after GC withdrawal. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed self-discontinuation, prior renal or pulmonary impairment or positive anti-dsDNA antibody were independent predictors of SLE relapse. Of the relapsed patients, 21.1% had achieved remission and 54.2% had achieved LLDAS at 12 months of follow-up. Those with high SLEDAI-2K score, anaemia, hypocomplementaemia as well as positive anti-dsDNA or anti-Sm antibody had lower remission rates. Conclusions: Most SLE patients have difficulty maintaining prolonged stabilization after discontinuing GC and regain remission within a year of relapse. Before discontinuing GC, risk factors associated with recurrence of SLE need to be assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.