ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Exploring the Factors Associated with Attrition in a Lifestyle Intervention Trial amongst Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Desiring Fertility - An Interview based Study.
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acupuncture for ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies exploring the barriers to weight management have suggested psychological, social and logistical barriers were important reasons for high attrition and non-adherence. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the possible reasons for high attrition and non-adherence to lifestyle interventions in a trial setting amongst women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) who wish to conceive. Setting and Design: The study was conducted in a tertary level hospital and employed a qualitative study paradigm. Materials and Methods: The study was nested within a feasibility study that explored the possibility of conducting lifestyle interventional trials in women with PCOS who wish to conceive. Eligible participants who refused participation in the trial were interviewed under three major categories: refusal before randomisation, refusal after randomisation and non-adherence. Statistical Analysis Used: Thematic analysis was used to analyse textual data. Results: The participants considered PCOS as a 'fairly common' condition and did not perceive the need to address the impact of PCOS on their health. The second recurring theme was the perception of being overweight as 'healthy' and 'normal' and downplaying lifestyle changes to focus only on fertility treatment for achieving pregnancy. Finally, the decision to pursue weight loss or to discontinue it seems to be a shared decision making among family memebers which limits the ability of the clinicians and healthcare practitioners to effectively deliver appropriate advice on lifestyle interventions. Conclusion: The current findings would help in planning and designing adequately powered randomised controlled trials to evaluate the impact of lifestyle intervention in women with PCOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.